Overview of the Multiperspectivity of Gender Roles Essay

Overview of the Multiperspectivity of Gender Roles - Essay ExampleGeorge Orwells novel, 1984, puts an indecisive light on womens role. This paper attempts to explore the multi-perspective gender roles obvious in Orwells novel, as well as delve in the exciting ambiguity of its feminine elements. Sacrificial Women The protagonists (Winston Smith) mother repetitively played the universal nature of the feminine gender -- being self-sacrificing. This sacrifice concept is commonly known to start when a cleaning lady marries (i.e., submitting herself to the hubby, and using the husbands family name) or upon conception (e.g., eating nutritious food for the babys consumption and non for herself). Roazen, in his essay Orwell, Freud, and 1984 strengthened the emphasis of this womans role through adding the adverb ideally in describing 1984s women as self-sacrificing creatures (section V, para. 1). Moreover, Winston explicitly expresses this through his own interpretation of his dream he coul d not remember what had happened, but he knew in his dream that in some way, the lives of his mother and sister had been sacrificed to his own (Orwell 78). ... Winston goes to say, ...they were down there because he was up here... (Orwell 77). However, no matter how saintly it sounds, reading the whole novel will expose to the readers, through Orwells narrative style and womens role, how ambivalent and ambiguous womens gender-role is. Protagonist-Effectual Though characters aside from the antagonist are used to stimulate events and the protagonist, Orwell effectively used the effectual gender-role of women to rise up that usual effectual mode. Smith pointed erupt the specifics 1) Winstons mother (i.e., her memory) encouraged him to desire a more liberal society 2) his wife, Katherine, intensified Winstons detestation of the Party 3) Julia triggered Winston to finally deviate from the afoul(ip) Big Brother and focus his intellectual pursuit to achieve freedom (1). However, one may argue that Winstons desires, decisions, or actions were mainly the offspring of his insubordinate nature and the feminine stimulus was nothing but inconsequential. Yet, it is more absurd to dispense the catalytic effect the women characters had on Winston. In reality, though every individual has the potential to act as such, this potential is not realized until an effective pushing factor motivates the person. This holds true in 1984, and to argue otherwise may credibly suggest the unrealistic framing of events and the useless tagging of such feminine encounters. Conformist In Orwells narrative, there is this evident contrast of feminine conformity and manly rebellion. For instance, as Orwell detailed Winstons dislike of women, since they were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the